The U.S. prostate cancer nuclear medicine diagnostics market size reached USD 119.06 million in 2023 and is projected to hit around USD 289.71 million by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 9.2% during the forecast period from 2024 to 2033.
Key Takeaways:
U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Overview
The U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market stands at the forefront of innovation, driven by the imperative need for precise diagnostic tools in the realm of prostate cancer detection. Prostate cancer, a prevalent health concern among men, underscores the significance of advanced diagnostic technologies, and nuclear medicine has emerged as a cornerstone in this pursuit.
U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Growth
The growth of the U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market is propelled by several key factors. Firstly, the increasing incidence rates of prostate cancer underscore the imperative for advanced diagnostic tools, with nuclear medicine offering a non-invasive and highly sensitive solution for early detection. Ongoing technological advancements in nuclear medicine, including novel radiopharmaceuticals and enhanced imaging techniques, contribute significantly to the market's expansion by providing more accurate and efficient diagnostic capabilities. The growing adoption of personalized medicine further fuels the demand for nuclear medicine diagnostics, allowing tailored treatment strategies based on detailed individual patient profiles. Collaborative research initiatives between industry players, research institutions, and healthcare providers play a pivotal role, fostering innovation and pushing the boundaries of diagnostic capabilities. This collaborative spirit, coupled with a commitment to improving patient outcomes, positions the U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market for continued growth and advancement in the realm of cancer diagnostics.
U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Report Scope
Report Attribute | Details |
Market Size in 2024 | USD 130.13 million |
Market Size by 2033 | USD 289.71 million |
Growth Rate From 2024 to 2033 | CAGR of 9.2% |
Base Year | 2023 |
Forecast Period | 2024 to 2033 |
Segments Covered | Type, PET product |
Market Analysis (Terms Used) | Value (US$ Million/Billion) or (Volume/Units) |
Report Coverage | Revenue forecast, company ranking, competitive landscape, growth factors, and trends |
Key Companies Profiled | Blue Earth Diagnostics; Siemens Healthcare Private Limited; Cardinal Health; CURIUM PHARMA; Lantheus; Jubilant Draximage Radiopharmacies, Inc.; NCM-USA LLC; Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited; ARICEUM THERAPEUTICS; Novartis AG; Life Molecular Imaging |
U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Dynamics
Drivers
Restraints
Opportunities
Challenges
Segments Insights:
Type Insights
Based on type, the market is segmented into Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Currently, SPECT and PET techniques are widely used in radiopharmaceutical diagnostic procedures. Affordability, ease of handling, the compatible half-life of radioisotopes, and a wide range of applications are the prime factors driving the diagnostic nuclear medicine market.
The SPECT segment held the largest market share of 61.15% in terms of revenue in 2023, owing to the low cost of scans and the ability to use easily obtained radioisotopes with a longer life than PET. Furthermore, an increase in clinical studies on SPECT radiopharmaceuticals to enable early diagnosis of prostate cancer is anticipated to propel the growth of the U.S. market.
According to the University of Utah Health, SPECT scanning has advantages over PET scanning. Firstly, it is easier to find, is more commonly used, and is less expensive. A SPECT scanner costs around USD 400,000 to USD 600,000, while a PET-CT scanner can cost over USD 1.5 million. Another benefit is that SPECT radiotracers remain in the body for a longer time of up to six hours, allowing doctors more time to capture images. On the contrary, PET tracers only last about 75 seconds. In addition, SPECT radiotracers are more affordable and readily available than PET tracers, making them a cost-effective choice for many hospitals and clinics.
On the other hand, the PET segment is expected to witness a lucrative growth rate of 9.5% over the forecast period, owing to superior image quality and higher reimbursement for its procedures compared to the traditional SPECT nuclear medicine diagnostic procedures. Radioisotopes used with PET prostate cancer diagnosis are Gallium-68, Fluorine-18, zirconium-89, copper-64, and Carbon-11.
According to the Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, claims from freestanding facilities are managed by regional Medicare Part B Carriers. These carriers process and pay the claims. Regarding PET scans, the CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) does not set standard payment rates for the technical component. Instead, each carrier decides how much to pay for the technical part of PET scans in their area.
PET Product Insights
The PET diagnostics market is segmented in terms of products into F-18 and SR-82/RB-82. F-18 held the largest market share of 75% in terms of revenue in 2023 owing to its efficient bio-distribution and relatively low urinary excretion. Fluorine-18 fluciclovine and Fludeoxyglucose F18 (F-18 FDG) are approved radioisotopes, whereas F18 sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) and 18F-Choline are the PET tracers widely studied due to their potential ability to detect tumors, including prostate cancer.
For instance, in May 2023, the FDA approved POSLUMA (flotufolastat F18) by Blue Earth Diagnostics as a PET imaging agent to detect PSMA-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer. This imaging method is suitable for men considering initial definitive treatment or suspected cancer recurrence based on elevated PSA levels. The FDA's decision to approve POSLUMA is backed by positive outcomes from the phase 3 SPOTLIGHT and LIGHTHOUSE trials. POSLUMA is thus now approved for use in PET imaging to find specific lesions in men with prostate cancer based on their PSA levels.
The SR-82/RB-82 segment is expected to expand at a CAGR of 9.9% over the forecast period, owing to factors such as the increased demand for PET scans for the diagnosis and staging of cancer, growing awareness of the benefits of PET scans, and development of new PET/CT scanners that are more efficient and easier to use. For instance, GE Healthcare launched the MI PET/CT Scanner. It is the first PET/CT scanner to use a new type of detector called a Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) detector.
SiPM detectors are more sensitive than traditional detectors, meaning they can detect lower levels of radioactivity. This can improve the accuracy of PET scans, especially in patients with low levels of cancer activity. The Discovery MI PET/CT Scanner is also more efficient than previous PET/CT scanners, which means it can scan patients faster and with less radiation exposure.
Key Companies & Market Share Insights
Key players in the market are focusing on adopting growth strategies, such as mergers and acquisitions, developing existing devices, promotional events, and technological advancements. For instance, United Imaging Healthcare launched the uMI 510 PET/CT Scanner, a high-resolution scanner with 110,592 LYSO crystals. This makes it one of the most sensitive PET/CT scanners available. The uMI 510 PET/CT Scanner is also more efficient than previous PET/CT scanners, which means it can scan patients faster and with less radiation exposure.
Key U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Companies:
Segments Covered in the Report
This report forecasts revenue growth at country levels and provides an analysis of the latest industry trends in each of the sub-segments from 2021 to 2033. For this study, Nova one advisor, Inc. has segmented the U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics market.
By Type
By PET Product
Chapter 1. Methodology and Scope
1.1. Market Segmentation & Scope
1.1.1. Type
1.1.2. PET product
1.1.3. Estimates and forecast timeline
1.2. Research Methodology
1.3. Information Procurement
1.3.1. Purchased database
1.3.2. nova one advisor’s internal database
1.3.3. Secondary sources
1.3.4. Primary research
1.3.5. Details of primary research
1.4. Information or Data Analysis
1.4.1. Data analysis models
1.5. Market Formulation & Validation
1.6. Model Details
1.7. List of Secondary Sources
1.8. List of Primary Sources
1.9. Objectives
Chapter 2. Executive Summary
2.1. Market Outlook
2.2. Segment Outlook
2.2.1. Type
2.2.2. PET product
2.3. Competitive Insights
Chapter 3. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Variables, Trends & Scope
3.1. Market Lineage Outlook
3.1.1. Parent market outlook
3.1.2. Related/ancillary market outlook
3.2. Penetration & Growth Prospect Mapping
3.3. Market Dynamics
3.3.1. Market driver analysis
3.3.2. Market restraint analysis
3.4. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market Analysis Tools
3.4.1. Industry Analysis - Porter’s Five Forces
3.4.1.1. Supplier power
3.4.1.2. Buyer power
3.4.1.3. Substitution threat
3.4.1.4. Threat of new entrant
3.4.1.5. Competitive rivalry
3.4.2. PESTEL Analysis
3.4.2.1. Political landscape
3.4.2.2. Technological landscape
3.4.2.3. Economic landscape
Chapter 4. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: Type Estimates & Trend Analysis
4.1. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: Key Takeaways
4.2. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: Type Movement & Market Share Analysis, 2022 & 2030
4.3. SPECT
4.3.1. SPECT market estimates and forecasts, 2021 to 2033
4.4. PET
4.4.1. PET market estimates and forecasts, 2021 to 2033
Chapter 5. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: PET Product Estimates & Trend Analysis
5.1. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: Key Takeaways
5.2. U.S. Prostate Cancer Nuclear Medicine Diagnostics Market: PET Product Movement & Market Share Analysis, 2022 & 2030
5.3. F-18
5.3.1. F-18 market estimates and forecasts, 2021 to 2033
5.4. SR-82/RB-82
5.4.1. SR-82/RB-82 market estimates and forecasts, 2021 to 2033
5.5. Others
5.5.1. Others market estimates and forecasts, 2021 to 2033
Chapter 6. Competitive Landscape
6.1. Recent Developments & Impact Analysis, By Key Participants
6.2. Company/Competition Categorization
6.2.1. Blue Earth Diagnostics
6.2.1.1. Company overview
6.2.1.2. Financial performance
6.2.1.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.1.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.2. Siemens Healthcare Private Limited
6.2.2.1. Company overview
6.2.2.2. Financial performance
6.2.2.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.2.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.3. Cardinal Health
6.2.3.1. Company overview
6.2.3.2. Financial performance
6.2.3.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.3.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.4. CURIUM PHARMA
6.2.4.1. Company overview
6.2.4.2. Financial performance
6.2.4.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.4.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.5. Lantheus
6.2.5.1. Company overview
6.2.5.2. Financial performance
6.2.5.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.5.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.6. Jubilant Draximage Radiopharmacies, Inc.
6.2.6.1. Company overview
6.2.6.2. Financial performance
6.2.6.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.6.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.7. NCM-USA LLC
6.2.7.1. Company overview
6.2.7.2. Financial performance
6.2.7.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.7.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.8. Telix Pharmaceuticals Limited
6.2.8.1. Company overview
6.2.8.2. Financial performance
6.2.8.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.8.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.9. ARICEUM THERAPEUTICS
6.2.9.1. Company overview
6.2.9.2. Financial performance
6.2.9.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.9.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.10. Novartis AG
6.2.10.1. Company overview
6.2.10.2. Financial performance
6.2.10.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.10.4. Strategic initiatives
6.2.11. Life Molecular Imaging
6.2.11.1. Company overview
6.2.11.2. Financial performance
6.2.11.3. Product benchmarking
6.2.11.4. Strategic initiatives